“Judicial Precedent should not be a source of law. The Benefits of judge-made law are undermined by the lack of its democratic legitimacy.” Critically analyze this statement, and decide whether or not you agree with it. You should make referenc
“Judicial Precedent should not be a source of law. The Benefits of judge-made law are undermined by the lack of its democratic legitimacy.” Critically analyze this statement, and decide whether or not you agree with it. You should make reference to relevant case law and statutory provisions in completing your answer. Note This is the Uk Law> Please remember when doing research and when picking law cases and references. Referencing is in form of Footnote

“Judicial Precedent should not be a source of law. The Benefits of judge-made law are undermined by the lack of its democratic legitimacy.” Critically analyze this statement, and decide whether or not you agree with it. You should make referenc
“Judicial Precedent should not be a source of law. The Benefits of judge-made law are undermined by the lack of its democratic legitimacy.” Critically analyze this statement, and decide whether or not you agree with it. You should make reference to relevant case law and statutory provisions in completing your answer. Note This is the Uk Law> Please remember when doing research and when picking law cases and references. Referencing is in form of Footnote